|
The big-box battle of Beverly Hills
Or how architectural restraint finally prevailed in the land of ostentation.
By Karen Alexander
Hamid Omrani drives up and down the southern residential streets of Beverly
Hills, stopping to point out the homes he has built. His dusty Ford Explorer
barely kicks into gear before he's stopping again. On some streets he can lay
claim to two or three houses per block.
The Iranian-born builder—he studied architecture and urban planning in
Tehran but is not a licensed architect—parks on Foothill Road just south of
Burton Way. The cream-colored two-story home on his right is much like dozens
of others in the neighborhood. Its 4,500 square feet dominate its
7,500-square-foot lot, and the result is a looming vault of stucco and glass
adorned by four hulking cement columns. It has all the grace of a Humvee in a
wedding dress.
Twenty years ago this imposing house would have seemed out of place on a
lot of its size, but today most of the homes on that block are of similar
scale and design. What looks out of place now is the charming one-story
Spanish-style house that remains across the street, a relic from the
neighborhood's original pre-World War II housing stock. With no established
architectural style to describe them, houses such as the ones Omrani builds
are derisively known in Beverly Hills as "Persian Palaces" because
they are particularly popular among the Iranian-born families who make up an
estimated 6,000 or more of the city's 34,000 residents (and nearly all of
Omrani's clientele). It's a stereotype, to be sure, but Omrani embraces the
term with enthusiastic pride.
"I believe everyone has the right to have his own palace," he says.
"If you can't afford a big palace, so we build you a smaller one."
This particular Foothill Road palace has a flat roof, two second-floor
balconies with glass French doors and 13 tall windows, most of them covered
from the inside by pleated paper shades. The oversized entry doors are glass,
embellished by ornate swirling brown metalwork. Thanks in part to Omrani's
coaxing, many Persians have come to consider massive concrete columns a symbol
of wealth. The builder says his clients pay $1,000 to $2,000 per column,
depending on their size and the amount of detail involved. This particular
home has four two-story columns flanking the façade, and two more supporting
a carport above the city-required driveway on the right-hand side of the
house—the only feature that prevents the building from being symmetrical.
The front yard features two anemic miniature palm trees and a black wrought
iron gate, which is a different color and style from the metalwork on the
entrance.
Inside, the five-bedroom, 5 1/2-bath house has the cavernous feel of an
upscale hotel lobby. The soaring two-story entryway features a lavishly inlaid
marble floor. Above the grand swirling staircase with its ornate metal
banister is a circular ceiling pattern surrounded by gold-tinted skylights.
Recessed lighting abounds, and even the crown moulding seems to have crown
moulding. With few walls, the entire space has an open, flowing feel. The
upstairs bedrooms include two with balconies over the front yard and three
with balconies over the petite backyard, where Omrani has crammed a pool and
spa, fire pit, wet bar, built-in grill, waterfall and a raised gazebo
supported by four more columns. It doubles as a carport. The back wall of the
house, made almost completely of windows, is embellished with four columns as
well.
While the sight of it might thrill the owner and hundreds of would-be palace
dwellers, it has mortified others in this profoundly image-conscious city.
It's not just that the new houses are bigger than their predecessors; all over
the country homes are being built larger. The problem here is that a lot of
people consider these houses the residential equivalent of a push-up
bra—in-your-face boastful, obtrusive, even vaguely obscene. There are a lot
of such houses in Beverly Hills, each one a reminder of the Persian
community's increasing influence and confidence in its adopted home.
So when the elected leaders of this unfailingly polite city this spring
adopted strict new design codes to help educate and encourage the Beverly
Hills home-building public on the finer points of aesthetic restraint, it was
with an undeniably sticky cultural subtext. Even the code's civil language has
an unmistakable tsk-tsk tone: "Emerging trends have led some
owners and developers in residential areas to disregard prevailing styles and
neighborhood character in an effort to maximize development and density . . .
[The trend] poses a serious danger that such overbuilding will degrade and
depreciate the character, image, beauty and reputation of the City's
residential neighborhoods with adverse consequences for the quality of life of
all residents."
Under the new design rules, it would be nearly impossible to build additional
homes in the style that many in the Persian community say they have come to
consider their own. New homes must have what city planners call
modulation—pitched roofs, courtyards or indentations, or variations to the
basic box-shape of the house that can make even a large building seem less
imposing.
But what then becomes of a builder such as Omrani, for whom the city's Persian
Palaces are a point of considerable pride? "I totally changed the
character of the area," boasts Omrani, who estimates that he has placed
close to 1,000 of his signature columns on residences around Beverly Hills.
"It is a symbol of wealth. How many columns do you have? They love
it."
Omrani returns to the Ford SUV he uses for visiting construction sites and
drives just one block south, where he has two more projects in various stages
of construction. He pauses forlornly before one. This, Omrani says, was one of
the last such homes he was able to squeeze through the city's planning process
before the new law slammed the door on his signature designs.
Omrani fled iran to escape the islamic revolution in 1980, five years after he
had completed his studies. He settled in Southern California, as did tens of
thousands of Iranians in the decades that followed, most of them Jews such as
himself. He has not returned to his native country since, but the memory of
Iran's rich architectural heritage is a constant refrain in his work. In
particular, Omrani says he was influenced by a palace in the ancient Iranian
city of Isfahan called the Chehel-Souton, which means "40 columns,"
although the building's 20 columns look like 40 only because they're reflected
in a pool of water.
Omrani is by no means the only one building big-box houses in Southern
California. Competitors and imitators abound from a variety of countries and
backgrounds, some of them far less capable than Omrani. But in Beverly Hills,
at least, he is the most prolific. Through his Wilshire Boulevard design firm
Omrani & Associates, as well as his building firm, Omrani Construction
Co., the 52-year-old claims to have built or dramatically remodeled more than
100 houses in the city, half of them in the last five years. Although his
creative passions are primarily for building hillside residences, the
seemingly insatiable demand for Persian-inspired California mini-palaces like
the one on Foothill Road has made them a staple of his recent work. His
handiwork is particularly abundant in the city's neighborhood south of Santa
Monica Boulevard and east of Beverly Drive, still considered the land of
so-called "starter homes" in Beverly Hills—this even though a
single-family house now is nearly impossible to find for less than a million
dollars, and Omrani says it costs about a million more to tear one down and
build a new house.
At those prices, today's Beverly Hills home buyers are less likely to be
satisfied living in a little old house with a big backyard. In some of the
city's southern neighborhoods, it goes almost without saying that the sale of
an older, single-story house will be followed by an army of tear-down workers
and equipment. The historically low interest rates that have fueled the recent
white-hot California real estate market also spurred the home-building
business in Beverly Hills to unprecedented levels. The city's Planning and
Community Development Department determined last year, for example, that
nearly 70% of the single-family homes between Wilshire Boulevard and Burton
Way had either been torn down or drastically remodeled since those
neighborhoods were established in the 1930s and '40s.
"At a million dollars just for the lot, nothing is worth saving,"
says West Hollywood developer Abi Kamara, who builds spec homes and
condominiums in Beverly Hills. "Nobody will pay a million-plus dollars
and live in a dump."
It took beverly hills 20 years to admit it had a problem, even as other cities
such as Santa Monica, San Marino and Pacific Grove took aggressive steps to
preserve their architectural heritages. In Santa Monica, for example, an
interim ordinance enacted last year places stricter size limits on
single-family homes in two parts of the city while requiring increased
setbacks to keep newer homes from overwhelming their neighbors. In contrast,
the new guidelines in Beverly Hills are intended to control the style of new
buildings, but don't place new limits on size. Remember, conspicuous wealth
isn't exactly considered a crime in this city.
But hulking, symmetrical stucco boxes with the presence of an IKEA store were
towering over more and more neighborhood homes, their builders showing little
regard for the prevailing medley of traditional architectural styles that once
made the city's more modest neighborhoods so whimsical.
Eventually, people started to talk. What they said wasn't always nice. Some
insiders adopted the jocular phrase "Canadians" so they could
discuss their Persian neighbors in public without offending. And when the city
conducted a survey last year as part of a general plan update, it found that
residents were screaming for some sort of design-review process to keep the
building frenzy in check.
Meanwhile, when the Los Angeles Conservancy issued its first ever preservation
report card in November, the organization slammed Beverly Hills with a
"D" grade. (Santa Monica, West Hollywood, Pasadena, South Pasadena,
Long Beach and Whittier were awarded "A"s, and Los Angeles scored a
"B-plus.") The rating itself garnered little notice from the city's
residents, but it gave the council additional political cover to make a move
that everyone knew would be seen by some as anti-Persian. With the backing of
the city's first Iranian-born council member, Jimmy Delshad, who was elected a
year ago, officials finally sprang into action.
But as word spread about the impending design code changes, the city's
Planning and Community Development Department received a rash of new building
permit applications from a familiar cadre of builders and developers. Omrani
in particular says he rushed to push through as many new projects as he could
before the rules were expected to take effect. The council responded in kind,
bypassing the usual legislative process and enacting an ordinance in March
that slammed the new design rules into place almost immediately. The move sent
Omrani and a handful of others back to the drawing board on about a dozen
pending projects.
Currently, the design ordinance covers the neighborhoods south of Santa Monica
Boulevard, which is by comparison the most modest section of this
5.69-square-mile city. It's there, where the lot sizes are relatively small,
that the palaces look most monstrous. Now a similar set of rules is in the
works for the northern portion of the city as well, where lot sizes are
significantly larger but building styles are no more restrained.
These new houses had a lot in common: flat rooflines, huge windows and
two-story entryways. Most offered little in the way of landscaping, unless you
counted the phalanx of towering columns out front or the coterie of luxury
cars and SUVs parked on a pad of cement where the front lawn used to be.
"Every time I see the worst one, another one pops up that is even
worse," says interior designer Marilyn Weiss, who served on a
subcommittee that developed the new design ordinance for the City Council and
completed a six-year term on the architectural commission that oversees
commercial and multifamily residential building in Beverly Hills. While she
supports the right to build homes according to personal style, she says
homeowners need to respect their neighbors on issues of "scale, mass and
bulk."
Eliza Eliasnik, on the other hand, couldn't be more pleased with the
five-bedroom, six-bath house that Omrani built for her family four years ago
on Maple Drive just north of Wilshire. It has four columns out front, four in
the back and another eight inside. Eliasnik had lived in the property's
original house since 1993, when she and her husband bought it for $565,000.
"It was nothing; it had one bathroom," she recalls.
Her new palace, built when she and her husband refinanced the original
property, is a dream come true. "I feel like the queen of Maple
Drive," she says. She says it has been a welcoming place to raise a
family after the heartbreak of fleeing Iran, and suggests that perhaps people
don't like houses like hers because they don't understand them.
"I have three kids. My husband has five brothers and two sisters. I have
two sisters and three brothers. Every Friday night on Shabbat we are together,
more than 50 people. With a smaller house it's impossible. Jewish Persian
people are always together, and they are not like American people that are
only together on Thanksgiving."
Council member Steve Webb, who campaigned last year promising to rein in
oversized homes, insists that the city is not trying to keep people from
building the larger houses that many homeowners have come to expect (see
sidebar). "I think we will get better quality homes and better designed
homes out of this," says council member Delshad, whose election to the
city leadership has been a source of great pride to the city's Persian
community.
Beverly Hills Mayor Mark Egerman says he reluctantly supported the permanent
design ordinance, but he was the only one to oppose hurried efforts to pass
the emergency measure. "Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder," he
says. "I don't believe anyone builds an ugly home on purpose."
Now Omrani and a coterie of other Iranian-born builders, homeowners and
developers claim that their cultural and artistic freedom is under siege.
"Anybody can tell which houses are owned by Persians. Whether they are
small houses or big houses, they are all the same," says Bijan Dardashti,
a Persian competitor of Omrani who also designs boxy-style houses in Beverly
Hills. He wonders if the City Council's concerns are more cultural than
architectural.
Developer Kamran Younai, who employs Omrani to design and build most of the
houses he and his father Albert undertake in Beverly Hills, wonders why the
city should be able to dictate the style of house that people build. "For
every brand new house we build, there's 80 people who can buy this house in a
month," says Younai. "There's three people with all-cash offers who
are willing to buy it the day you finish it."
Omrani takes it all personally. "What's the goal of this design rule? So
they can push you into the corner. It's against your style, your culture, your
lifestyle," he says. "I am target number one, I will tell you
that."
Council members Webb and Delshad and Mayor Egerman insist that the new design
code is not meant to single out the city's Persians, and even prominent
Iranian-American residents bristle at the suggestion that the stereotypical
Persian Palace is in any way distinctly Persian. "I wouldn't dignify
that," says Hamid Gabbay, an Iranian-born architect who served on a
committee that helped develop the city's new style guidelines and also is a
former chair of the city's arts and planning commissions. He says the
council's motivations are removed from its relationship with the
Iranian-American community in Beverly Hills, and the style of housing in
question "has nothing to do with Persian architecture."
"The reason you can't find the boxes or the columns" in the city's
new style catalog "is because there is not such a thing as that
style," Gabbay says. "The roof is Mediterranean ceramic, the
capitals are Corinthian, the body of the columns are Tuscan and the windows
could be aluminum. It really is a joke."
Omrani is not laughing as he sits in his office, fretting over the new design
rules and explaining his vision for a more cultured, truly modern Beverly
Hills. Covering the expansive wall behind him is a color rendering of his
dream project—a blocks-long redesign of the urban vortex of Beverly Hills,
the maddening tangle of traffic lights at the intersection of Wilshire and
Santa Monica boulevards. Omrani envisions a labyrinth of raised pedestrian
walkways connecting the buildings in a kind of Jetsons-meets-ancient-Persia
streetscape. At the center, 23 stories above the intersection, seven hulking
columns support a circular museum of the arts. It's a Persian Palace of truly
palatial dimensions.
In the meantime, Omrani scribbles impatiently on a yellow pad, attempting to
demonstrate the futility of trying to build a suitable mini-palace within the
new residential design limits. "How can I design with this Mickey Mouse
shape? They like the house to be cut like that, but then what can you do
inside?"
The answer may come from Omrani's clients. Several Persian developers and
realtors in Beverly Hills suggest that the stereotypical Persian Palace may be
going out of style among the city's younger, more assimilated generation of
Iranians. "My younger clients say, 'I don't want something that screams,
'I am Persian,' " says designer Dardashti.
For his part, Omrani makes his own home outside of Beverly Hills, in part
because there is more artistic freedom in neighboring Los Angeles. He is
building his own dream palace in Doheny Estates, a community north of Sunset
Boulevard. It's going to be a 7,508-square-foot house shaped like a boat and
surrounded by water. It will, he says, have lots and lots of columns.
Karen Alexander is a former Los Angeles Times staff writer now living in
Northern California.
Swimmin' Pools, Movie Stars,
Home-Design Regs
Under the City of Beverly Hills' new design codes, home builders face a
three-tiered process intended to assist them in keeping their more grandiose
impulses in check.
If a proposed house adheres to one of 22 pre-established styles, it can
still be built to the maximum allowable size for a single-family home in
Beverly Hills, which is 40% of the size of the lot, plus 1,500 square feet.
(By that equation, a house on a 50-by-150-foot lot such as Eliza Eliasnik's
could still be 4,500 square feet, as hers is, but it would have to be shaped
differently.)
The accepted styles fit into five broad categories: American Colonial, Rural
European Revival, Spanish Colonial, Contemporary and Period Revival, as well
as additional styles that aren't easily categorized, such as Craftsman,
Bungalow and Art Deco. Their particular features are laid out in painstaking
detail in the city's new 125-page style catalog.
To veer from the prescribed styles, however, a home may not be built larger
than 40% of the size of the lot without meeting certain additional criteria.
Under this second tier of scrutiny, a set of rewards and incentives has been
put in place to help make a structure seem less imposing. Builders can win
back additional square footage by incorporating certain modulating features
and "neighborly amenities."
For example, adding a courtyard or setting the second story back from the
front of the house can earn a builder an additional 500 square feet each. A
sloped roof is worth an additional 300 square feet, as is the use of mature
landscaping. But if a builder objects to those so-called modulating
features, then his or her plans must gain the approval of a newly
established design review commission, which will be made up of citizens and
at least one architect.
The application deadline for that five-member commission was May 31, with
final selection of its members expected sometime this month.
Search the archives
of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories. You will not be
charged to look for stories, only to retrieve one.-
|